|
| |
Juliana's Golden Mole (Neamblysomus julianae)
is an Endangered species |
|
|
|

Photo ©
Tim Jackson |

Photo
© Gary Bronner |
|
| |
I really think we all need to be
aware of this little animals plight - especially because
they live on our doorstep and we actually can make a
difference !
Please go to the Juliana Golden Mole Blog (Click Here) and
post your comments. Juliana's Golden Mole (Neamblysomus
julianae) is an Endangered species, endemic to
South Africa. Only three subpopulations are known and much
of the habitat of the topotypical subpopulation (currently
listed as Critically Endangered) has been dramatically
altered and degraded as a result of urbanization and
high-density housing developments along the Bronberg Ridge
in Tshwane (Pretoria). Quartzite mining operations threaten
to destroy the sole remaining dispersal corridor between
eastern and western subpopulations, which could lead to
genetic erosion and reduced population viability. |
|
| |
| |
|
Taxonomy |
|
Kingdom
|
ANIMALIA |
|
Phylum
|
CHORDATA |
|
Class
|
MAMMALIA |
|
Order
|
AFROSORICIDA |
|
Family
|
CHRYSOCHLORIDAE |
|
Common Name/s
|
JULIANA'S GOLDEN MOLE (E) |
|
Species Authority
|
(Meester, 1972) |
|
Infra-specific Taxa Assessed
|
See
Neamblysomus julianae
(Bronberg Ridge subpopulation) |
|
Synonym/s
|
Amblysomus julianae
Meester, 1972 |
|
Taxonomic Notes
|
Consistent colour, dental and DNA differences
exist between the three known populations from
the geographical extremes of this species' range
suggest that it may include two taxa; however,
more specimens are needed before the status of
these forms will become clear (Bronner 1990,
1995). Assigned to the genus Neamblysomus
by Bronner (1995). |
|
Assessment Information |
|
Red List Category & Criteria |
EN B2ab(iii)
ver 3.1 (2001)
|
|
Year Assessed
|
2006 |
|
Assessor/s
|
Bronner, G. (Afrotheria Specialist Group)
|
|
Evaluator/s
|
Rathbun, G. (Afrotheria Red List Authority) &
Sechrest, W. (Global Mammal Assessment)
|
|
Justification
|
Known from five localities and three
subpopulations. The topotypical subpopulation
(Pretoria) is treated separately and afforded CR
status. While the other two subpopulations occur
within protected areas, there are no
intermediate distribution records suggesting
gene flow between them, and only a small part of
the range of the range of Nylsvley subpopulation
occurs within a protected area, the rest being
in adjoining farmlands that are subject to
habitat alteration and potential degradation.
|
|
History
|
|
1986 |
- |
Rare (IUCN Conservation Monitoring
Centre 1986) |
|
1988 |
- |
Rare (IUCN Conservation Monitoring
Centre 1988) |
|
1990 |
- |
Indeterminate (IUCN 1990) |
|
1994 |
- |
Indeterminate (Groombridge 1994) |
|
1996 |
- |
Critically Endangered (Baillie and
Groombridge 1996) |
|
|
Distribution |
|
Country Names
|
South Africa |
|
Detailed Documentation |
|
Range
|
Tshwane (Pretoria) (Gauteng), Nylstroom (Limpopo
Prov.) and Kruger Nat. Park (Mpumalanga, South
Africa). Recorded from three isolated
populations: The Willows (type locality), Shere
and Tierpoort in Tshwane (Pretoria), Gauteng
(here treated as a distinct subpopulation);
Nylsvley Provincial Nature Reserve in Limpopo
Province; and Numbi Gate, Pretoriuskop and
Matjulwana districts of Kruger National Park, in
the lowveld of Mpumalanga. Skulls from owl
pellets at Witkoppen Cave, ca. 25km east of
Nyslvley Nature Reserve, represent this species,
suggesting that it may occur more widely
throughout the sandy Springbok Flats. A specimen
that may be this species was recently (March
2003) caught at Malelane in Mpumalanga, but
genetic data are required to confirm this
(analyses currently underway). If this specimen
is indeed a N. julianae, this species
range in the lowveld may also be more extensive
than previously thought. |
|
Population
|
Locally common, with 2–3 individuals/ha in prime
habitat. However, dispersion is patchy and
clumped owing to specialized habitat
requirements. No data on population size;
extrapolation from area of occupancy based on
quarter degree squares (3,720 km2)
will overestimate population size given their
clumped dispersion. |
|
Habitat and Ecology
|
Confined to sandy soils, often pockets of
weathered sandstone associated with rocky
ridges, in the Savanna biome, and marginally
into the Grassland biome in the Pretoria
district. The population on Nyl floodplain
occurs in Clay Thorn Bushveld and the population
at Pretoria in Rocky Highveld Grassland, whereas
in the Kruger National Park this species occurs
in Sour Lowveld Bushveld. Common in
well-irrigated gardens. Absent from grasslands
on the heavier soils of the Mpumalanga
escarpment where the larger-sized A.
septentrionalis and A. robustus
instead occur. |
|
Threats
|
In the former Transvaal Province, this species
was given the highest regional priority score
for mammals (Freitag and van Jaarsveld 1997).
The type population on Bronberg ridge outside
Tshwane (Pretoria) is being severely impacted by
intensive urbanization and a mining operation,
and is treated as a distinct subpopulation (CR
status). While the other two subpopulations
occur within protected areas, there are no
intermediate distribution records suggesting
gene flow between them, and the Nylsvley
subpopulation also occurs in farmlands
(adjoining the Nylsvley Nature Reserve) that are
subject to habitat alteration and potential
degradation, though the impact thereof on this
subpopulation is unknown. |
|
Conservation Measures
|
The Pretoria subpopulation, treated here as a
distinct subpopulation, is threatened by habitat
degradation and subpopulation fragmentation
associated with urbanization and mining
activities. The other two known populations are
protected to some degree by the Kruger National
Park and Nylsvley Nature Reserve. |
|
Summary Documentation |
|
System
|
Terrestrial |
|
Major Habitat/s
(terms)
|
|
2.2 |
Savanna - Moist |
|
3.4 |
Shrubland - Temperate |
|
4.4 |
Grassland - Temperate |
|
4.5 |
Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry
Lowland |
|
11.1 |
Artificial/Terrestrial - Arable Land |
|
11.2 |
Artificial/Terrestrial - Pastureland |
|
11.3 |
Artificial/Terrestrial - Plantations |
|
11.4 |
Artificial/Terrestrial - Rural Gardens |
|
11.5 |
Artificial/Terrestrial - Urban Areas |
|
13 |
Introduced Vegetation |
|
|
Major Threat/s
(terms)
|
|
1.3.1 |
Habitat Loss/Degradation - Extraction -
Mining (ongoing) |
|
1.4.1 |
Habitat Loss/Degradation -
Infrastructure development - Industry
(ongoing) |
|
1.4.2 |
Habitat Loss/Degradation -
Infrastructure development - Human
settlement (ongoing) |
|
9.1 |
Intrinsic factors - Limited dispersal
(ongoing) |
|
9.9 |
Intrinsic factors - Restricted range
(ongoing) |
|
|
Population Trend
(terms)
|
 |
|
Conservation Action/s
(terms)
|
|
1.1.1 |
Policy-based actions - Management plans
- Development (in place, needed) |
|
1.1.2 |
Policy-based actions - Management plans
- Implementation (needed) |
|
1.2.1.2 |
Policy-based actions - Legislation -
Development - National level (needed) |
|
1.2.1.3 |
Policy-based actions - Legislation -
Development - Sub-national level (in
place, needed) |
|
1.2.2.2 |
Policy-based actions - Legislation -
Implementation - National level (needed) |
|
1.2.2.3 |
Policy-based actions - Legislation -
Implementation - Sub-national level
(needed) |
|
2.2 |
Communication and Education - Awareness
(needed) |
|
3.1 |
Research actions - Taxonomy (in place,
needed) |
|
3.2 |
Research actions - Population numbers
and range (needed) |
|
3.3 |
Research actions - Biology and Ecology
(needed) |
|
3.4 |
Research actions - Habitat status
(needed) |
|
3.5 |
Research actions - Threats (needed) |
|
3.8 |
Research actions - Conservation measures
(needed) |
|
3.9 |
Research actions - Trends/Monitoring
(needed) |
|
4.4.1 |
Habitat and site-based actions -
Protected areas - Identification of new
protected areas (needed) |
|
4.4.2 |
Habitat and site-based actions -
Protected areas - Establishment (needed) |
|
4.4.3 |
Habitat and site-based actions -
Protected areas - Management (needed) |
|
|
Data Sources |
|
Data Sources
|
Afrotheria
Specialist Group. For more information, see the
Specialist Group website
Baillie, J.
and Groombridge, B. (compilers and editors)
1996. 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened
Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Bronner,
G.N. 1990. New distribution records for four
mammal species, with notes on their taxonomy and
ecology. Koedoe 33: 1–7.
Bronner,
G.N. 1995. Systematic revision of the golden
mole genera Amblysomus, Chlorotalpa
and Calcochloris (Insectivora:
Chrysochloromorpha; Chrysochloridae). Ph.D.
thesis, University of Natal (Durban), South
Africa.
Freitag S.
and Van Jaarsveld, A.S. 1997. Relative
occupancy, endemism, taxonomic distinctiveness
and vulnerability: prioritising regional
conservation actions. Biodiversity and
Conservation 6: 211–232.
Groombridge, B. (ed.) 1994. 1994 IUCN Red
List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland,
Switzerland.
IUCN
Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1986. 1986
IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN,
Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN
Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1988. 1988
IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN,
Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN.
1990. 1990 IUCN Red List of Threatened
Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and
Cambridge, UK.
Nowak, R.M.
(ed.) 1999. Walkers Mammals of the World.
Sixth edition. The Johns Hopkins University
Press, Baltimore and London.
Pfab, M.
2002. The quartzite ridges of Gauteng. Veld &
Flora 2002(June issue): 56–59.
Wilson,
D.E. and Reeder, D.M. (eds). 1993. Mammal
Species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic
reference. Second edition. Smithsonian
Institution Press, Washington and London. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|